Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On a recent thread someone asked about this website - couldn't remember it at the time but here it is.

Political Compass


Answer the questions and it will plot you on a matrix between Authoritarian / Libertarian and Left / Right on the Economy


I'm in the bottom right hand corner - but not the extreme bottom right.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5673-political-compass/
Share on other sites

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm in the bottom right hand corner - but not the

> extreme bottom right.



By the website?s reasoning then MM http://www.politicalcompass.org/extremeright you really should be supporting the Lib Dems and not the Conservatives who are ideologically pretty similar to New Labour but just a bit more fascist.


I?m down in the far left corner.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By the website?s reasoning then MM http://www.politicalcompass.org/extremeright you really should be supporting the Lib Dems and not the Conservatives who are ideologically pretty similar to New Labour but just a bit more fascist.

>

>

> I?m down in the far left corner.


I'm trying to drag the Conservative Party back to its roots - socially and financially liberal.


My score is:


Economic Left/Right: 5.25

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51

I scored.


Economic left/right: -4.50

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.44


Interesting as the test was I don't think it was long or varied enough but in all honesty who am I too say, just my opinion.


Oh and can we just keep it too what it is 'a simple test' and not a 100 page thread/slanging match and please for the love of Elvis don't go all Guardian on us and actually feel you merit some personal moral comparison to either Ghandi or the Pope.

Not at all Matthew as I know you were being all tongue in cheek but mark my words there are some out there who will look into the mirror for two long whilst reminiscing over a previous charity event and will attempt draw a parallel of nurse Nightingale and the light brigade while they're at it. Watch this space!

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh and can we just keep it too what it is 'a

> simple test' and not a 100 page thread/slanging

> match and please for the love of Elvis don't go

> all Guardian on us and actually feel you merit

> some personal moral comparison to either Ghandi or

> the Pope.



BBW I am pleased to announce that I am closer to the Dalai Lama than to Gandhi, and therefore, henceforth you may all refer to me as Her Holiness. As for the love of Elvis, I sadly suspect that he and I would not share a quadrant.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm very much in the middle, ever-so-slightly top

> left of centre ("authoritarian left").

>

> Not the one I would have picked beforehand, I must

> say. The same quadrant as Pope Benedict XVI (ouch)

> and Robert Mugabe (double ouch).


OK, I get it now... I was just looking at the diagram explaining the axes. Duh. My actual diagram was hidden because it's blocked at work (presumably as it contains the work "facebook"! fascists!). I'm actually :


Economic Left/Right: -3.62

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.00


But this isn't what I was expecting either... oh well.

I'm not sure you could say that the roots of the Conservative party were financially liberal. Within years of forming the party your 'grassroots' backbenchers along with the Whigs rebelled against the repeal of the corn laws because they favoured protetionism.


As for social liberalism, the Conservatives only agreed tentatively with the Reform Act, which only allowed 1 in 5 men to vote, and no women. It also split the party.


Whatever the debate, this is hardly evidence of consistent roots in either social or financial liberalism.


That was the end of your lot for decades.

I seem to be pretty much slap bang in the middle between Libertairian and Left

But I can't for the life of me work out how to embed the graph into the thread

Better not fart about for too long as I've got shed loads of work to get done so this will have to do!


http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-6.38&soc=-6.87


http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-6.38&soc=-6.87

I tried to really think about these, and not just answer based on my morals, but what I thought was sensible, and I still came out as a soft lefty.


Economic Left/Right: -5.75

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54


Some questions are badly worded. I disagreed with "Those with the ability to pay should have the right to higher standards of medical care", because it's not about having the right to better care, but I'm not totally against private health care for those who want it.

Yep, the question is deliberately biased.


Of course in an ideal world everybody would have access to excellent healthcare. But in reality, I'm not going to turn down the medical insurance I get with my job... and we live in a country where anyone can get NHS treatment (which in my opinion is still pretty good). I don't really have a problem with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...