Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On a recent thread someone asked about this website - couldn't remember it at the time but here it is.

Political Compass


Answer the questions and it will plot you on a matrix between Authoritarian / Libertarian and Left / Right on the Economy


I'm in the bottom right hand corner - but not the extreme bottom right.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5673-political-compass/
Share on other sites

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I'm in the bottom right hand corner - but not the

> extreme bottom right.



By the website?s reasoning then MM http://www.politicalcompass.org/extremeright you really should be supporting the Lib Dems and not the Conservatives who are ideologically pretty similar to New Labour but just a bit more fascist.


I?m down in the far left corner.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> By the website?s reasoning then MM http://www.politicalcompass.org/extremeright you really should be supporting the Lib Dems and not the Conservatives who are ideologically pretty similar to New Labour but just a bit more fascist.

>

>

> I?m down in the far left corner.


I'm trying to drag the Conservative Party back to its roots - socially and financially liberal.


My score is:


Economic Left/Right: 5.25

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51

I scored.


Economic left/right: -4.50

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.44


Interesting as the test was I don't think it was long or varied enough but in all honesty who am I too say, just my opinion.


Oh and can we just keep it too what it is 'a simple test' and not a 100 page thread/slanging match and please for the love of Elvis don't go all Guardian on us and actually feel you merit some personal moral comparison to either Ghandi or the Pope.

Not at all Matthew as I know you were being all tongue in cheek but mark my words there are some out there who will look into the mirror for two long whilst reminiscing over a previous charity event and will attempt draw a parallel of nurse Nightingale and the light brigade while they're at it. Watch this space!

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh and can we just keep it too what it is 'a

> simple test' and not a 100 page thread/slanging

> match and please for the love of Elvis don't go

> all Guardian on us and actually feel you merit

> some personal moral comparison to either Ghandi or

> the Pope.



BBW I am pleased to announce that I am closer to the Dalai Lama than to Gandhi, and therefore, henceforth you may all refer to me as Her Holiness. As for the love of Elvis, I sadly suspect that he and I would not share a quadrant.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm very much in the middle, ever-so-slightly top

> left of centre ("authoritarian left").

>

> Not the one I would have picked beforehand, I must

> say. The same quadrant as Pope Benedict XVI (ouch)

> and Robert Mugabe (double ouch).


OK, I get it now... I was just looking at the diagram explaining the axes. Duh. My actual diagram was hidden because it's blocked at work (presumably as it contains the work "facebook"! fascists!). I'm actually :


Economic Left/Right: -3.62

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.00


But this isn't what I was expecting either... oh well.

I'm not sure you could say that the roots of the Conservative party were financially liberal. Within years of forming the party your 'grassroots' backbenchers along with the Whigs rebelled against the repeal of the corn laws because they favoured protetionism.


As for social liberalism, the Conservatives only agreed tentatively with the Reform Act, which only allowed 1 in 5 men to vote, and no women. It also split the party.


Whatever the debate, this is hardly evidence of consistent roots in either social or financial liberalism.


That was the end of your lot for decades.

I seem to be pretty much slap bang in the middle between Libertairian and Left

But I can't for the life of me work out how to embed the graph into the thread

Better not fart about for too long as I've got shed loads of work to get done so this will have to do!


http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-6.38&soc=-6.87


http://www.politicalcompass.org/printablegraph?ec=-6.38&soc=-6.87

I tried to really think about these, and not just answer based on my morals, but what I thought was sensible, and I still came out as a soft lefty.


Economic Left/Right: -5.75

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54


Some questions are badly worded. I disagreed with "Those with the ability to pay should have the right to higher standards of medical care", because it's not about having the right to better care, but I'm not totally against private health care for those who want it.

Yep, the question is deliberately biased.


Of course in an ideal world everybody would have access to excellent healthcare. But in reality, I'm not going to turn down the medical insurance I get with my job... and we live in a country where anyone can get NHS treatment (which in my opinion is still pretty good). I don't really have a problem with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers Special Needs Journal. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...