Jump to content

I confronted a thuggish dog fouler (Lounged)


poppylucky

Recommended Posts

Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.


I think you're uptight about allowing people a say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset and you're clearly not.


Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just having a bit of fun with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who_cares Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.

>

>

> I think you're uptight about allowing people a

> say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here

> are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset

> and you're clearly not.

>

> Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just

> having a bit of fun with you.



I think the clique mentality of this forum always shines through with certain regulars trying to control the board. I was pilloried here once for asking if a shop was still trading because over a period of weeks I, and others, never found it open. Intolerence and bullying is never acceptable. Even on a forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was asking if a shop was open ( it was in fact closed during that period of time ) bullying ???? I think I appealed to you forumites to play nicely, during the time of my brushe with the rough side of this forum; akin to a dog rolling over when being beaten !


''Bites wearily'' . I do hope not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with dulwichdoll, there is a ganging up element, it's pretty obvious that there's some kind of power struggle going on. But then if it's all some people have in their lives, I'd also hate to see that taken away from them, who knows if they didn't have this, they might actually leave the house and do someone real harm.


There was a topic but now there is no topic other than the one they decide they want to talk about, i.e what's a worthwhile post (as dictated by them) and how much crap can we throw at someone in a misguided attempt at comedy... because it's all a joke apparently... except when the joke's on them.


The best one is that poster who quotes people's whole post back to them and then writes something "incomprehensible" at the bottom of it. Or the other poster who quotes the original post a line at a time, replying to each line in the style of some kind of free association exercise. I'm guessing the knack of grasping entire paragraphs of meaning has always eluded that one. Shame...


Ho hum what fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My version would've been alot better and there would've been at least two cameo appearances. Poppy would be played by Diana Rigg from the Avengers. The thug would've been played by Ray Winston (his character from Scum). The Policeman played by John Thaw's Jack Regan who ends up shooting the thug (Winston) in the face. The dog, Mutley.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horsebox Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

>

> ooh, Louisa! I love it when you talk dirty!


Horsebox it was why I was put on this earth, make no mistake!


And for the record... Dulwichdoll, get a grip my love, you are turning this entire fabrication into a media frenzy, it was a lovely tale and we all went along with it so where is the problem? I dont have one! (Although I do tend to prefer BBW's version of this)


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also thought the collection vans did not also deliver at the same time, or at least up town they operate very separately. Does anyone else know more?
    • We were trying to contact Steve on 07990904375, following this post and yet there wasn't any reply from this number. Is it a correct number to contact Steve for decoration work?  
    • You might be 'amused' but obviously its something thats enough of a concern that there are specific rules in the entrance criteria to specifically disallow this, so not exactly comparative.  Aside from the flawed analysis, the idea of so much movement that there is a massive cost to the taxpayer of finding extra schooling is also unlikely.  As I noted upthread, the cost of private school education has increased dramatically in recent years.  Increases in fees over 10% per annum in some cases, so the idea that the application of VAT would drive the majority out just isn't the case.  There will be some who can't afford it any more. But then there are lots of people who couldn't afford it in the first place. Anyone who has accepted a school place in the last 2-3 years will have known this was Labour's policy, so their kids will be in year 9 by the time Labour gets in.  That would mean that only parents of those with children in years 10/11 likely to have been unaware when signing up.  They can obviously move their children for sixth form if needed.  The others shouldn't be surprised!  Those with children in juniors will need to take a view whether affordable or move to the state sector. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...