Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.


I think you're uptight about allowing people a say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset and you're clearly not.


Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just having a bit of fun with you.

who_cares Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.

>

>

> I think you're uptight about allowing people a

> say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here

> are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset

> and you're clearly not.

>

> Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just

> having a bit of fun with you.



I think the clique mentality of this forum always shines through with certain regulars trying to control the board. I was pilloried here once for asking if a shop was still trading because over a period of weeks I, and others, never found it open. Intolerence and bullying is never acceptable. Even on a forum.

Why was asking if a shop was open ( it was in fact closed during that period of time ) bullying ???? I think I appealed to you forumites to play nicely, during the time of my brushe with the rough side of this forum; akin to a dog rolling over when being beaten !


''Bites wearily'' . I do hope not.

I agree with dulwichdoll, there is a ganging up element, it's pretty obvious that there's some kind of power struggle going on. But then if it's all some people have in their lives, I'd also hate to see that taken away from them, who knows if they didn't have this, they might actually leave the house and do someone real harm.


There was a topic but now there is no topic other than the one they decide they want to talk about, i.e what's a worthwhile post (as dictated by them) and how much crap can we throw at someone in a misguided attempt at comedy... because it's all a joke apparently... except when the joke's on them.


The best one is that poster who quotes people's whole post back to them and then writes something "incomprehensible" at the bottom of it. Or the other poster who quotes the original post a line at a time, replying to each line in the style of some kind of free association exercise. I'm guessing the knack of grasping entire paragraphs of meaning has always eluded that one. Shame...


Ho hum what fun.

Why are you judging her ? Who are any of you to say she is not telling the truth ? Maybe its your imagination or lack of it that is getting carried away. Its clear for all to see who is on this forums panel/jury of truthfulness arbitrators.
My version would've been alot better and there would've been at least two cameo appearances. Poppy would be played by Diana Rigg from the Avengers. The thug would've been played by Ray Winston (his character from Scum). The Policeman played by John Thaw's Jack Regan who ends up shooting the thug (Winston) in the face. The dog, Mutley.

Horsebox Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

>

> ooh, Louisa! I love it when you talk dirty!


Horsebox it was why I was put on this earth, make no mistake!


And for the record... Dulwichdoll, get a grip my love, you are turning this entire fabrication into a media frenzy, it was a lovely tale and we all went along with it so where is the problem? I dont have one! (Although I do tend to prefer BBW's version of this)


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...