Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.


I think you're uptight about allowing people a say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset and you're clearly not.


Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just having a bit of fun with you.

who_cares Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.

>

>

> I think you're uptight about allowing people a

> say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here

> are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset

> and you're clearly not.

>

> Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just

> having a bit of fun with you.



I think the clique mentality of this forum always shines through with certain regulars trying to control the board. I was pilloried here once for asking if a shop was still trading because over a period of weeks I, and others, never found it open. Intolerence and bullying is never acceptable. Even on a forum.

Why was asking if a shop was open ( it was in fact closed during that period of time ) bullying ???? I think I appealed to you forumites to play nicely, during the time of my brushe with the rough side of this forum; akin to a dog rolling over when being beaten !


''Bites wearily'' . I do hope not.

I agree with dulwichdoll, there is a ganging up element, it's pretty obvious that there's some kind of power struggle going on. But then if it's all some people have in their lives, I'd also hate to see that taken away from them, who knows if they didn't have this, they might actually leave the house and do someone real harm.


There was a topic but now there is no topic other than the one they decide they want to talk about, i.e what's a worthwhile post (as dictated by them) and how much crap can we throw at someone in a misguided attempt at comedy... because it's all a joke apparently... except when the joke's on them.


The best one is that poster who quotes people's whole post back to them and then writes something "incomprehensible" at the bottom of it. Or the other poster who quotes the original post a line at a time, replying to each line in the style of some kind of free association exercise. I'm guessing the knack of grasping entire paragraphs of meaning has always eluded that one. Shame...


Ho hum what fun.

Why are you judging her ? Who are any of you to say she is not telling the truth ? Maybe its your imagination or lack of it that is getting carried away. Its clear for all to see who is on this forums panel/jury of truthfulness arbitrators.
My version would've been alot better and there would've been at least two cameo appearances. Poppy would be played by Diana Rigg from the Avengers. The thug would've been played by Ray Winston (his character from Scum). The Policeman played by John Thaw's Jack Regan who ends up shooting the thug (Winston) in the face. The dog, Mutley.

Horsebox Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

>

> ooh, Louisa! I love it when you talk dirty!


Horsebox it was why I was put on this earth, make no mistake!


And for the record... Dulwichdoll, get a grip my love, you are turning this entire fabrication into a media frenzy, it was a lovely tale and we all went along with it so where is the problem? I dont have one! (Although I do tend to prefer BBW's version of this)


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...