Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks, Jeremy. Delving further into the canyons of my mind (thanks Bonzo Dogs), I seem to remember (possibly from another post on this Forum) that the person who lives in the upstairs flat owns the whole premises and doesn't want to make any changes - they have therefore left the shop empty. Can anyone shed any further light on this?
Wasn't the W. Rose site an underwear shop in more recent times? The window displays were sometimes quite 'adult', not XXX mind you and more Ann Summers than Agent Provocateur. I recall male mannequins in tight, striped, ribbed, cotton boxers in the window. T'was never open, not each time I walked past anyway. Very odd.
  • 6 months later...
the continuing dereliction and emptiness of what used to victoria wine (apart from a brief excursion into cannabis farming!!) is as puzzling as it is unwelcome. apparently, owner of the freehold is now very old, but I am told still insists that it can only be an off licence and that the manager must live in the flat above. the lease is owned by (I think) punch taverns who find it cheaper to continue to leave it empty and just run down the lease. it is a great shame because, even in these tough times, many would like to take over a retail business in such a prime spot.

Planetsally Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Foxton's site was the DSS office but was by

> then rebranded and called the "Benefits Agency"

> and there was an "Employment

> Services"(Jobcentre)along where Haart estate

> agents is. I'm sure there was a Woolwich building

> society there as well at the time.



Yes there was, Woolwich was acquired by Barclays and they closed I think it was 08/09 with Woolwich products now being sold at Barclays.


William Hill and Haart were all part of Dulwich Jobcentre before they were turned into two separate retail outlets.

  • 2 months later...

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone remember the old arts and crafts shop

> opposite what was then Gateway and next door to

> Yilmaz Kebab?

>

> Louisa.



Yes, bought a few make it yourself balsa wood model planes from there when I was a kid.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ..and East Dulwich Police station used to be an

> M&S



What year was this - I've lived in ED over 30 years and cannot recall an M&S.... interesting


Bushell?........

Sugar was a video shop called Dusaras and then a Barber shop..

Dulwich cafe was Starburger and before that - an amazing steak house....

  • 3 years later...
Thanks reg for giving me a rush of blood before the big it was Tivoli amusements and before that keabeech amusements. Oddonos was Sally's florist cave Bruno was a fire place salvage shop run by Bob before Mrs Robinson's it was a baby's clothes shop and before that also fires and surrounds the second hand car place was next to edt ibought a second hand mark 4 cortina in canary yellow before William rose it was womens undercrackers and before that bespoke windows the sports shop was fsshion sport and leisure this was made smaller to accommodate a mobile phone shop this is now jazzes barbers the coop was at first a Kwik save
Co-op was Somerfield and before that Gateway. Fabric was a dry cleaner and I think before that a TV shop. There was a fancy Thai restaurant on Melbourne Grove called Thai Pavilion - and the clothes and toy shop mentioned above where Property In is was Hey Diddle Diddle that later turned into Soup Dragon and moved over the road, with yoga classes etc above it.
This fish and chip shop was called Georges he did have a son called Elvis who opened a chippie on north cross road opposite the pub the current electrical suppliers was Pearson's glaziers clippers used to be strands barbers and before that a massage parlour
... and what about that VERY strange shop (Target Arms?) for all your, let's call it "war" memorabilia needs - I see they're still operating online where the crossbows seem very reasonably priced and the "german Party badges" are a snip at 8 of your SS pounds...
Target Arms also sold antique (back to early 19c. militaria) and uniforms (and antique oriental weapons, not 'samaurai replica' - much of their stock was not WWII or related. But, in terms of sheer volume, there is a lot of WWII stuff about, so it's not surprising they stocked quite a lot of that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...