Spartacus

Good point Blah Blah Everyone can do their bit to help slow the spread. Wear a face mask fully covering your mouth and nose when in shops and other required areas. Wearing it just covering your mouth is as dangerous as not wearing it. Where possible stick to the 2m rule (despite everything the rule is still there with the exception of where it's not practical i.e. going for a haircut or similar activity that needs closer contact.) Wash your hands frequently and for the required time. Use the track and trace app and if you are asked to isolate do so, it may save your or a close family members life. If you show signs of Covid, isolate and book.a test Most of all stay safe, stay alive.

Whilst the letter highlighted by blah blah has some obvious fake names, I am concerned by its contents as they are basically calling for the elderly and vulnerable to be shielded again and for healthy people to catch covid, the so called herd immunity that was so wildly poo pooed 6 months ago. However what the signatures of the letter fail to recognise is that healthy people can get long covid as a result, which leaves them with serious debilitating side effects that may have even longer consequences for their lives and health. https://www.longcovid.org/resources This on top of the cricket games attracting crowds on Rye Lane really concerns me that people have become covid nonchalant which may well come back to bite them !

Serena2012 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is this really what Southwark intended in the > middle of a pandemic? Why are all these changes so > ill-thought through? > > https://twitter.com/jamesjonesfilm/status/13150399 > 44117755904?s=21 I saw this on twitter and noticed that the story has been updated by LBC concerning antisocial behaviour on Rye Lane caused by the closure. I see that the BBC also has the video as part of its lead story, not a good image for Peckham or the council. BBC News - Covid: Second national lockdown possible, says top UK scientist https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54498191

Whilst it's disturbing and I hope nothing more comes off it,I can't help feeling that you are describing the opening scene to a Halloween film 😱

@rahrahrah The question you raise about not offering alternatives, as there hasn't or possibly won't be a consultation by the council, anything anyone offered on here is irrelevant and what a lot of people are simply asking for is a proper consultation process on road closures to be run with concerns and views of all not just the few being taken into consideration. Do you think changes that effect so many should be pushed through without a proper and inclusive consultation ?

Half a stone age jammy dodger Obvious really

James How can the council continue with the roll-out of LTNs when the emergency services have concerns with their implementation ? https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/police-and-ambulance-service-wont-support-hard-road-closures-as-new-road-changes-unveiled/

No support for physical road closures by the emergency services https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/police-and-ambulance-service-wont-support-hard-road-closures-as-new-road-changes-unveiled/ It's about time the council paused and listened to the concerns of the public, businesses and emergency services

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would personally prefer see more often closures > with camera enforcement to non Southwark residents > to stop rat running. Often quoted ot me that half > of Southwark traffic start and ends journey > outside Southwark so huge proportion of rat > running down streets never designed for such > traffic levels. Sounds to me James that you want to make Dulwich a gated community to keep the Riff Raff from other boroughs or towns out 😱

Two separate points The improvement in public transport, as mentioned above, is the real solution but it's possible that the cost is too high so the approach is go for the low cost option of penalising car drivers and make them walk and cycle. Very shortsighted IMHO. Second point, has anyone noticed the increased heavy traffic using side roads coming off Lordship Lane where people are trying to bypass the closure or finding other routes to get to their destination ?

Ex I'm concerned by your statement " if you're driving 20km then you probably have a few more possibilities that don't affect the overall time of the journey." Are you saying that people can't drive through our back yard to get to wherever but it's okay as they will find routes through other people's backyards ? All well and good but as councils are putting in LTNs in everyone's back yard, then that 10 mile journey (we still use miles not km in this country) will take 2 or 3 times as long,producing more pollution and possibly a higher accident risk for others as frustration boils up. That journey may be essential, it may not but we don't know only the driver does.

I love the fact that Government and Local authorities reward failure as they expect all the money to be spent and punish those who don't spend it all by reducing what they get next time. This encourages mad spending schemes. If the system was that they rewarded those that saved money by allowing them to bank the savings and use it for bigger projects later on, then instead of spending on speed bumps we might end up with better facilities locally as they can combine savings over a number of years. Completely bonkers backwards system IMHO

PeckhamNicola Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Am I right that it works using Bluetooth, and if > so does it eat through battery power like crazy? It doesn't seem to use that much more battery from my experience of the app on my phone

Today he is quoted in the evening standard asking for a review of the 10pm curfew as it is counter productive https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-10pm-curfew-review-london-counterproductive-a4566116.html But I seem to remember that around the 21st September the mayor was asking for the 10pm curfew to be introduced. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-london-could-face-fresh-restrictions-under-mayors-new-plan-12077137 Confused dot com or as some papers might say "Last orders for Mayor in u-turn fiasco"

Good write up in the Southwark news https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/becoming-like-a-ghost-town-east-dulwich-traders-fear-closure-after-low-emission-road-blocks-installed/ Not convinced by Councillor Rose's quote Councillor Catherine Rose, cabinet member for leisure, environment and roads at Tooley Street, gave the following statement: ?We understand the concerns raised by businesses on Melbourne Grove. ?Both myself, Cllr Burgess and ward councillors have met with the traders and are very sympathetic to the issues they have raised, we are reviewing the impact of the traffic reducing measures on their businesses and looking at what mitigations can be put in place. ?I want to see a long term, sustainable reduction in cars and low traffic neighbourhoods are one of a variety of potentially impactful ways of achieving low traffic Southwark. ?It?s important to encourage active travel to our high streets and we?ll also be working with traders to see what we can do to increase cycle parking in the Grove Vale and Melbourne Grove area.? To me it felt like, yeah yeah we've heard you complaint but we're keeping the measures regardless because everyone must cycle.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ha ha, please list what are Southwark's strong > points ?! They are strong at NOT consulting with all stakeholders !

New software / apps always have teething bugs, I suspect that in this case they will be quickly ironed our with future updates. As a result keep on using it, report bugs you see to help in this process and stay safe.

Rockets and fairTgirl Couldn't agree more. The council and councillors are just paying lip service to people whilst ignoring them totally. Come elections they won't be happy to lose their seats I suspect.

The whole concept of streaming directly to a customer by the studios is half the reason cinemas declined back in the 80s when films were available on VHS so people put off going as renting it was cheaper then going to the cinema After a few years technology changed in the cinemas and people fell in love with the big screen again so numbers went up again. If the studios go down the path of streaming then whilst convenient for some, the cinemas won't survive after this pandemic which will result in a lost revenue stream for the studios (people who go to the cinema are often tempted to buy and rewatch the film at home after) Today "the Batman" and Dune movies followed bond by delaying their launch dates which is another reason cinemas are temporarily closing their doors as there aren't enough good new films to draw the audiences in. Can't blame the Studios for their decision as they need to recoup the production costs but by the same token they aren't doing enough to maintain the cinema chains through the next 6 months. Let's hope and pray that the Picturehouse chain and peckham plex have the good fortune to weather this situation as I for one miss the big screen experience.

When I saw this I thought "Uh oh inappropriate thread alert" Then I realised it was about broadband and not the fabled and now virtually impossible to find unmarried woman devoted to religion or only willing to give her maidenhead up in marriage or to God. Phew glad that's clarified my confusion

Credit where credit due so in his case it's a whingefest😂

kford Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There's a decent Mini with a council destruction > notice on it on Cranthrew Road Modern (Maxi thing) or original (proper old mini aka twiggy, Beatles era ) ?

Today is the first day of a week of rain and showers according to accuweather on my phone Will be fascinating to see how many of the new cyclists are fair-weathered and how much more traffic will be on the streets as little Tarquin or Tamara get driven to school in the rain or so called non essential journeys to the shops are undertaken by car to save getting soaked? The next week will be quite telling on how much traffic has really dissipated and how popular walking or cycling is in the squalid weather.

Robbie Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JohnL Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Here's the leak on a two week London lockdown. > > > > > https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/emergency-lockd > > > > own-london-north-england-socialising-household-mix > > > ing-a4557601.html > > > > In Wales I notice pubs are having licensing > > suspended if they break the rules. > > > > > https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/swan > > > sea-bar-closed-immediate-effect-19006786 > > Under the new emergency lockdown, all bars, > restaurants and pubs would be told to shut for two > weeks initially, while households would be banned > indefinitely from meeting indoors, the Times > reports. > > As part of the social lockdown, ministers > reportedly said schools, offices, and shops would > stay open. > > Surely it should be the other way around? I can't > have a family member visit me, but I can get on > public tranporta nd travel to work in a building > containing thousands of people? Makes no sense > whatsoever Just think, you could be travelling to work on Air Force One where one person can spread it to their boss and family 🤔 But agree , that work and travel does present a risk which is why we are now being asked to work from home if we can. A reverse of the thinking a month ago of go to the office if you can. I guess regardless we all have our own part to play in suppressing this virus and flouting the rules because we don't agree with them won't help break the chain.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Spartacus Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Do you mean something like this : > > > https://thisismold.com/object/kitchenware/alessi-p > > > izzico-pinch-of-salt#.X3TiiB7TU0M ? > > > > Not sure if it's something you can get locally > but > > I'm sure if you show a local shop this then > they > > can either order one for you or worst case > > scenario you may have to go online to order it > > Someone always has to ruin a potentially good > thread with a dose of reality. Sorry I'm sure ! Lol Was Bob trying to ironic in his initial post because if he was then I obviously failed to take it with the pinch of salt he is after. But Alan m , please don't rub salt in to my wounds for missing the gag 😱 as I now feel like I've been asSALTed !