Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We moved here from near West Dulwich four years ago after our first baby. Really love it here. There is definitely more a of a friendly community feel and lots more to do for young families and adults for that matter. West Dulwich always felt like a suburb of Dulwich Village to me.

Both West Dulwich and Forest Hill are zone 3, which adds cost and not a tiny amount of shame. But if you're coming from Clapham (blow ins, as the conspicuously absent contributor would say) - then Balham is normalised for your circles no doubt, so zone 3 may be acceptable.


HOP is duller, but you're on the cusp, Overground is more frequent than via Denmark Hill, and LL is very close. West Dulwich isn't really much of a place, but good line to Victoria. You'd be better at the Herne Hill end and using the amenities there, which are quite good when it's not submerged.

Sorry tiddles but I strongly disagree with you: tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think West Dulwich is probably easier for

> schools if you are not going private (elm

> green/dunraven/charter)


Dunraven intake is mostly Streatham, and you've a snowflake in hell's chance of getting into The Charter from West Dulwich - it's an East Dulwich/Camberwell/Herne Hill school. ED state Primaries are pretty much all brilliant, and the secondary situation with Charter/Kingsdale/Harris boys & girls plus a new school planned is as good as, if not better than, WD's.


> Larger houses for your money. West norwood high

> street is not far away - grittier than Lordship

> lane but lots of useful shops and some nice coffee

> places.


Yes WD does have larger gardens. ED's Lordship Lane has the 'useful shops and an abundance of 'nice coffee places', just with a pleasanter feel to the high street - it's a nice place to browse, especially on a Saturday with Northcross market - sadly I couldn't say the same of Norwood High street.


> also getting a cinema and have recently had a

> sports centre refurbed, many family friendly pubs.


You're describing East Dulwich here aren't you?


> I think East Dulwich has peaked and LL will be a

> victim of its own success and become more like

> Northcote road with its chains and parking

> charges.


I've been hearing this for the last 15 years - it hasn't happened yet - but you could still be proved right. Still, if a couple is moving from Cla'ham, maybe the Northcote Rd parallel makes ED even more appealing?


WD is lovely, but it's a no-brainer to me - anyone who knows the area at all would surely go for ED every time? ED is fab :D

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Both West Dulwich and Forest Hill are zone 3,

> which adds cost and not a tiny amount of shame.

> But if you're coming from Clapham (blow ins, as

> the conspicuously absent contributor would say) -

> then Balham is normalised for your circles no

> doubt, so zone 3 may be acceptable.

>

> HOP is duller, but you're on the cusp, Overground

> is more frequent than via Denmark Hill, and LL is

> very close. West Dulwich isn't really much of a

> place, but good line to Victoria. You'd be better

> at the Herne Hill end and using the amenities

> there, which are quite good when it's not

> submerged.



"Not a tiny amount of shame" - what a ridiculous comment.... "West Dulwich isn't really much of a place" - well we've lived here for 16 years and love it - there's a wonderful community spirit and people are very friendly, but then you'd only know that if you lived here.....

I lived in Denmark hill for a few years followed by east dulwich for a few years (peckham rye park side) then lSt year moved to a street where we're slap bang on the border between west dulwich and west norwood.


I don't miss east dulwich at all apart from peckham rye park. Everywhere had started to feel very samey to me, perhaps I had been there for too long.Many of the pubs started to resemble each other and the crowd always seemed exactly the same, wherever you went. There's not one restaurant in east dulwich that I've wanted to go back to since we left. But while I was living in se22 I thought I never wanted to leave it.


We do back regularly to Denmark hill though which feels a bit more eclectic to me.


I do agree there are fewer pubs and restaurants in wd and se27 but as our friends started to buy properties and disperse we often find ourselves travelling to other parts of london to see them so we do not feel we need dozens of places on our doorstep. We have a handful and that's fine. The bus links from west norwood are so good we can be in brixton in 15 min max, or crystal palace, or Denmark hill or we can walk to dulwich village, or herne hill. Transport from tulse hill station into the city and beyond is excellent. I love walking through west dulwich and gipsy hill up to crystal palace, the streets and the views are beautiful.


I think you could be very happy east or west. Both places have a lot to offer.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> a 40 minute walk is good for you! Come now, lets

> not be soft. Besides, depends on the route taken.

> Cycling is quite popular I hear.

>

> I used to walk every day to and from school from

> East Dulwich to West Dulwich no more than a 30

> minute walk, never did me any harm and certainly

> taught me to not depend on motorised modes of

> transport.

> I'm confused over your comment over amenities.

> What is your definition of an amenity? BOTH areas

> have an abundance of everything one could possibly

> need - shops (whether a cluster of tacky

> independent shops or several "local" supermarket

> chains near by), schools, transport, health

> facilities, pubs/bars/eateries. What more could

> you want?

> When people think of East Dulwich where do they

> actually mean? Lordship Lane? Of course it's a

> buzzing area (LL) but then what else is there, if

> you were to take away the "high street", that

> makes ED superior to West Dulwich?



My comment about amenities just refers to variety. So for instance, I am not aware that there is a gym in West Dulwich itself (though I think someone mentioned there was one nearby in Norwood). If you live in East Dulwich, you have tennis clubs, squash courts, the Fusion Gym, Push Studios (for classes / yoga / pilates / Zumba etc), and two parks with organized fitness activities such as British Military Fitness a running club etc.

For pubs / Gastropubs, it?s the same. West Dulwich has the Rosedale (which I like) and the Allen?s Head as far as I know (maybe there are more decent ones). Whereas in East Dulwich, you have The EDT, The Bishop, The Actress, The Great Exhibition, Franklins, The Palmerston, The Patch, The Castle, the Cherry Tree, the Herne Tavern, The Dulwich Plough, and the Rose.


The same is true when you look at shops, restaurants, caf??s, hairdressers etc. East Dulwich just has a lot more choice and variety of things to do / places to shop etc.

And as you can see from the above, I don?t just mean Lordship Lane. East Dulwich Road, North Cross Road, Whately, Melbourne, Barry Road etc all have amenities on them spread throughout the area though Lordship Land is obviously the main drag.


I don?t mind walking 40 minutes and it is good for you but a 1 hour 20 min round trip on foot to visit the amenities in East Dulwich isn?t exactly easily accessible / casual access. A bike would make it much shorter but if you want to go out to dinner or out drinking you?ll probably be looking at a 7-10 quid taxi back home. Not really a big deal but Peckham, Forest Hill and Dulwich Village are much more easily accessible to East Dulwich than West Dulwich.

Lastly, I didn?t say ED was superior to West Dulwich. I said both were very nice areas, but with a different vibe. West Dulwich has better housing stock and is a bit quieter and East Dulwich has more amenities and buzz but with tiny houses and is poorer value for money in that respect.

Don't believe this isn't a wind-up.


Ask for help deciding between East and West Dulwich then announce...


"In the interim our offer on a small (~55sqmt) 2 bedroom flat near WD has been accepted at ?400,000. Its a ground floor garden flat. What do you guys think? Regards - A & N"


"WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK?".....


My vote is on a bored or mischievous EDForumite.


Either way, its been entertaining so far.

Wind up or not, I wanted to comment :-) West Dulwich has great commuting options: West Dulwich station goes to Victoria and Blackfriars. We also have Tulse Hill which serves London Bridge and Blackfriars.


West Dulwich is not as big as East Dulwich, true, but it is still a great area. Shops on South Croxted Road and Rosendale Road cover everything you might need - deli, butchers, toy shop, award winning book shop, bakery, a bank, plenty of hairdressers, gift shops, clothes shops, a garden centre & a few places to eat. And of course the family friendly Rosendale Pub. Then there is the lovely Belair Park and Belair House, for cocktails and food.


Dulwich Park and Dulwich Pic Gallery are only 15 mins walk away.


Great nurseries and state primary schools too.

I moved to ED 4 years ago, after about 10 years in WD. You can't compare the two really, it depends on what you are looking for. ED has a lot more going on and more transport options, however WD has everything that you may need - if you love a place, you'll simply make things work for you.


I loved living WD, was very happy there - but chose to buy here in the end. I'd not say no to moving back to WD either, if things had to change etc.. There is an excellent GP practice (well it was for me), Paxton Green Group Practice, if you happen to be in the catchment for it.

I left ED two years ago for the better value of Honor Oak Park. In its defence, HOP has some great restaurants for a relatively small area - Donde, Babur, Le Querce and Sodo Pizza are all in a different league. It is far from dull and I hardly ever feel the need to return to Lordship Lane. Transport links are much better than either WD or ED too.
west Dulwich definitely - get in the catchment for Rosendale primary school and then you'll be near Herne Hill too which is fab and family friendly. Not sure why people keep saying transport is rubbish - its not at all! W Dulwich goes to Victoria and St Pancras during morning rush hour, and obviously Brixton for the tube and herne hill also goes to City thameslink etc Easy walk through the park to Brixton Tube (or number 3 bus) and then you have the brilliant Brixton market with loads of great restaurants. Also its smack bang in the middle of 3 parks - Dulwich, brockwell and Belair. Also have the lido in brockwell park. Rosendale pub is great - good food and great for children.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction then pick up the 345 from Falcon Road ( exit Clapham Junction Station from the back entrance) The overground will terminate on platform one anyway so you're already on that side of the station. The 345 bit should take you approximately 30 minutes and the overground from Denmark Hill to CJ approximately 15 minutes. All the best!!
    • I would go to Victoria (185 bus or Southern Rail) then get either a bus from there to Chelsea Town hall (I think it may be the C1 but I'm not sure..I moved from that area over 25 years ago) and the Royal Marsden is a short walk from there. OR get a Underground from Victoria to Sloane square and a Taxi from there to Royal Marsden..It would'nt cost much because its a few mins away..or a bus from Sloane Square to Chelsea Town Hall or Fulham Rd/Sydney St 
    • I don't know how the law works, nor what rules cover what doctors can and can't say in their professional and private (?personal?) capacities,  but on the face of it I agree that some of the comments quoted are unacceptable, to say the least. However, in the context of the subject of this thread,  I think it is important to differentiate between antisemitism ("hostility to or prejudice against Jewish people") and hostility to  the Israeli government's apparent attempted genocide of Palestinian civilians in retribution for the appalling attack on Israeli civilians by Hamas. I might be completely wrong here, and naive, and I am sure someone will correct me if I am, but it seems to me to be as if the English government had started trying to annihilate the whole of the  Irish population because of the IRA bombings in the nineties. I also realise that there is a whole historic background to the Palestine/Israel thing, but I am not familiar with it. Anyway, I and everyone I know who has taken part in any of the recent marches has done so to try to get our government to stop supporting genocide, not because they are antisemitic. And yes there are other awful things going on in the world, and always have been. I can't fight all of them. One of my brothers has taken in three generations of  a Ukrainian family. ETA: Do you really think it is OK to refer to people as "blacks"? Or am I wrong about that as well, and there is some reason why it is acceptable?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...