Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lesbian Vampire killers says it all really doesn't

> it. If I were family I'd disown them.


I wholly agree. For one thing, I find the title ambiguous and confusing. Is the film about:-


a) Lesbians who kill vampires

b) Killers of lesbian vampires

c) Lesbian vampires who are also killers (kind of a tautology, non?)

d) Two unattractive men who would like to make sexist comments about and later stab to death gorgeous women who don't want to have sex with them, while pretending to be in a comedy.

Fatty and Smug are awful. Clearly their agent has wandered into the BBC and said they'll do a sketch show for cheap. Just pay those two huge fees and they'll save on the rest by writing it themselves and doing it cheaply. BBC gets current hot talent on TV, Horne & Corden get paid a ruck load of money, nobody laughs.


They have two jokes - one is sniggering at homosexuality and the other is that Fatty can wave his belly around.


Has anyone seen the Al Murray sketch show? I have heard that is almost as bad.

Victims of their own success.

Series 1 was written whilst Corden and the actress who plays Nessa were unknown. Lots of time, no deadlines. Then all of a sudden demands for the second series (which is ok), Chrimbo specials, and now this series and that film...think Noel Gallagher after the Definitely Maybe & Morning Glory albums...

What, coked up to the eyeballs?


I heard they didn't write "Lesbian Vampire Killers" - which is surprising given how poor it is and how obvious and childish the humour. I imagine it was made a little before they got quite so famous. Nonetheless, they still agreed to do it so shame on them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...