Jump to content

Horne and Corden


Xena Worried prince

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lesbian Vampire killers says it all really doesn't

> it. If I were family I'd disown them.


I wholly agree. For one thing, I find the title ambiguous and confusing. Is the film about:-


a) Lesbians who kill vampires

b) Killers of lesbian vampires

c) Lesbian vampires who are also killers (kind of a tautology, non?)

d) Two unattractive men who would like to make sexist comments about and later stab to death gorgeous women who don't want to have sex with them, while pretending to be in a comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fatty and Smug are awful. Clearly their agent has wandered into the BBC and said they'll do a sketch show for cheap. Just pay those two huge fees and they'll save on the rest by writing it themselves and doing it cheaply. BBC gets current hot talent on TV, Horne & Corden get paid a ruck load of money, nobody laughs.


They have two jokes - one is sniggering at homosexuality and the other is that Fatty can wave his belly around.


Has anyone seen the Al Murray sketch show? I have heard that is almost as bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Victims of their own success.

Series 1 was written whilst Corden and the actress who plays Nessa were unknown. Lots of time, no deadlines. Then all of a sudden demands for the second series (which is ok), Chrimbo specials, and now this series and that film...think Noel Gallagher after the Definitely Maybe & Morning Glory albums...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What, coked up to the eyeballs?


I heard they didn't write "Lesbian Vampire Killers" - which is surprising given how poor it is and how obvious and childish the humour. I imagine it was made a little before they got quite so famous. Nonetheless, they still agreed to do it so shame on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moos said "Glad you said that, LegalE - I like 2 Pints too!"


and the rest, Moos: we've seen you at the drinks!


Horne and Corden are on the beeb so everyone knows they're hopeless - Al Murray is on ITV so no one knows whether or not he's unfunny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
    • More than the 2 contestants, the format and production was the main fault last night - allowing 45 seconds for an answer will get you those responses from any 2 candidates Awful show
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...