Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lesbian Vampire killers says it all really doesn't

> it. If I were family I'd disown them.


I wholly agree. For one thing, I find the title ambiguous and confusing. Is the film about:-


a) Lesbians who kill vampires

b) Killers of lesbian vampires

c) Lesbian vampires who are also killers (kind of a tautology, non?)

d) Two unattractive men who would like to make sexist comments about and later stab to death gorgeous women who don't want to have sex with them, while pretending to be in a comedy.

Fatty and Smug are awful. Clearly their agent has wandered into the BBC and said they'll do a sketch show for cheap. Just pay those two huge fees and they'll save on the rest by writing it themselves and doing it cheaply. BBC gets current hot talent on TV, Horne & Corden get paid a ruck load of money, nobody laughs.


They have two jokes - one is sniggering at homosexuality and the other is that Fatty can wave his belly around.


Has anyone seen the Al Murray sketch show? I have heard that is almost as bad.

Victims of their own success.

Series 1 was written whilst Corden and the actress who plays Nessa were unknown. Lots of time, no deadlines. Then all of a sudden demands for the second series (which is ok), Chrimbo specials, and now this series and that film...think Noel Gallagher after the Definitely Maybe & Morning Glory albums...

What, coked up to the eyeballs?


I heard they didn't write "Lesbian Vampire Killers" - which is surprising given how poor it is and how obvious and childish the humour. I imagine it was made a little before they got quite so famous. Nonetheless, they still agreed to do it so shame on them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax?  Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT). 
    • Your post was an attack on the tax   I didn’t  address or mention you in my reply. Just pointed  out the problems with the article you then told be I wasn’t invited.  In no way am I bullying anyone. The reverse is true if anything 
    • The problem is, I'm not sure what the going rate is for park land for festivals of this nature. I'm sure they are paying less than outfits pay for access to the big stadia - but these have better facilities and are normally better for public transport. I am also sure that Councils could press for more, and should do so, but of course there isn't really a shortage of council lands to exploit, so these entrepreneurs could go elsewhere. What I would like to know is how much of the suggested £440,000 this year for Southwark is net profit - what are their costs in getting and administering this let? If this is a gross figure then what do they actually have as 'surplus'? But at least we have a starting point now - even if it's a guess I'm thinking it's a reasonably informed one.
    • Looks like owner of Persepolis is opening something late summer in what was The dulwich Beer Dispensary spot…  Excited about that  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...