Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.


I think you're uptight about allowing people a say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset and you're clearly not.


Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just having a bit of fun with you.

who_cares Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Asset, admit it, you are the thuggish dog fouler.

>

>

> I think you're uptight about allowing people a

> say... when did I say I didn't care? Names on here

> are hardly accurate, otherwise you'd be an Asset

> and you're clearly not.

>

> Don't take it all too seriously though, I'm just

> having a bit of fun with you.



I think the clique mentality of this forum always shines through with certain regulars trying to control the board. I was pilloried here once for asking if a shop was still trading because over a period of weeks I, and others, never found it open. Intolerence and bullying is never acceptable. Even on a forum.

Why was asking if a shop was open ( it was in fact closed during that period of time ) bullying ???? I think I appealed to you forumites to play nicely, during the time of my brushe with the rough side of this forum; akin to a dog rolling over when being beaten !


''Bites wearily'' . I do hope not.

I agree with dulwichdoll, there is a ganging up element, it's pretty obvious that there's some kind of power struggle going on. But then if it's all some people have in their lives, I'd also hate to see that taken away from them, who knows if they didn't have this, they might actually leave the house and do someone real harm.


There was a topic but now there is no topic other than the one they decide they want to talk about, i.e what's a worthwhile post (as dictated by them) and how much crap can we throw at someone in a misguided attempt at comedy... because it's all a joke apparently... except when the joke's on them.


The best one is that poster who quotes people's whole post back to them and then writes something "incomprehensible" at the bottom of it. Or the other poster who quotes the original post a line at a time, replying to each line in the style of some kind of free association exercise. I'm guessing the knack of grasping entire paragraphs of meaning has always eluded that one. Shame...


Ho hum what fun.

Why are you judging her ? Who are any of you to say she is not telling the truth ? Maybe its your imagination or lack of it that is getting carried away. Its clear for all to see who is on this forums panel/jury of truthfulness arbitrators.
My version would've been alot better and there would've been at least two cameo appearances. Poppy would be played by Diana Rigg from the Avengers. The thug would've been played by Ray Winston (his character from Scum). The Policeman played by John Thaw's Jack Regan who ends up shooting the thug (Winston) in the face. The dog, Mutley.

Horsebox Wrote:

---------------------------------------------------

>

> ooh, Louisa! I love it when you talk dirty!


Horsebox it was why I was put on this earth, make no mistake!


And for the record... Dulwichdoll, get a grip my love, you are turning this entire fabrication into a media frenzy, it was a lovely tale and we all went along with it so where is the problem? I dont have one! (Although I do tend to prefer BBW's version of this)


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...