Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone else thinks this but I am wondering how Michael Jackson's children can possibly be biologically his as they (look) completely caucasion and don't look in any way mixed race? (or mixed heritage as a friend who has recently had a mixed race baby told me)


I know that this can sometimes happen but all three of his children? (first two are the same mother, Debbie Rowe and the third child is from an unknown surrogate mother)


No-one ever seems to raise this - at the moment I am working in the newsroom of a TV prog where they are going crazy on the Michael Jackson coverage but no-one else seems to querying this! Is it just me???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6833-michael-jacksons-children/
Share on other sites

At 11.51, I said;


"I saw pictures of his kids last night - normal photos I hasten to add.


His kids, shall we say, dont look much like him in his youth, although they do have some similarities with the older Jacko"


So, no, not just you. It is weird; or not when you think of the Father.

Ahh, well that makes more sense - wonder again though why this never pops up in coverage tho but I guess he must have offically adopted them from birth etc so he is legally their parent.


And I meant to say dual heritage not mixed heritage.


daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read yesterday that Debbie Rowe has said that

> they are'nt his. She said she was artificially

> inseminated by an unknown donor, in the medical

> centre where she met him .

When Jacko was last up on a kiddie fiddling charge it was said that Macauley Culkin told lawyers that he would not appear as a witness if anything was raised about his alleged sperm donations to one of Wacko Jacko's kids. It's rumoured that he maybe the father of one of them.

I think in years to come they will all be quite pleased not to be biologically connected to him,who wants to be in that gene pool! they are all a bunch of loons. I would have thought they are legally his though.


Either way I loved his music and I think the world of pop music has lost its greatest entertainer, is there any body left who can compare to him, I don't think there is.


Vince

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They have been bred to form a new group. Standby

> for battle lines regarding custody.

----------------------------------------------------------


Oh you couldn't make it up, have you read the press (you know ,the sh1ttier red tops ) seems the mafia are "involved" too

and as an aside he was bald the poor fella, I don't know why but that bit shocked me more somehow!



Oh boy.....


W**F



W**F

A recent trip to the barbers has now brought me fully up-to-speed on the case (Wacko exclusive pages 1,2,tits,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,sport-yawn)


I can't believe most of his left leg was made of plastic and nobody knew! Incredible - considering the moves he pulled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...