Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone else thinks this but I am wondering how Michael Jackson's children can possibly be biologically his as they (look) completely caucasion and don't look in any way mixed race? (or mixed heritage as a friend who has recently had a mixed race baby told me)


I know that this can sometimes happen but all three of his children? (first two are the same mother, Debbie Rowe and the third child is from an unknown surrogate mother)


No-one ever seems to raise this - at the moment I am working in the newsroom of a TV prog where they are going crazy on the Michael Jackson coverage but no-one else seems to querying this! Is it just me???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6833-michael-jacksons-children/
Share on other sites

At 11.51, I said;


"I saw pictures of his kids last night - normal photos I hasten to add.


His kids, shall we say, dont look much like him in his youth, although they do have some similarities with the older Jacko"


So, no, not just you. It is weird; or not when you think of the Father.

Ahh, well that makes more sense - wonder again though why this never pops up in coverage tho but I guess he must have offically adopted them from birth etc so he is legally their parent.


And I meant to say dual heritage not mixed heritage.


daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read yesterday that Debbie Rowe has said that

> they are'nt his. She said she was artificially

> inseminated by an unknown donor, in the medical

> centre where she met him .

When Jacko was last up on a kiddie fiddling charge it was said that Macauley Culkin told lawyers that he would not appear as a witness if anything was raised about his alleged sperm donations to one of Wacko Jacko's kids. It's rumoured that he maybe the father of one of them.

I think in years to come they will all be quite pleased not to be biologically connected to him,who wants to be in that gene pool! they are all a bunch of loons. I would have thought they are legally his though.


Either way I loved his music and I think the world of pop music has lost its greatest entertainer, is there any body left who can compare to him, I don't think there is.


Vince

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They have been bred to form a new group. Standby

> for battle lines regarding custody.

----------------------------------------------------------


Oh you couldn't make it up, have you read the press (you know ,the sh1ttier red tops ) seems the mafia are "involved" too

and as an aside he was bald the poor fella, I don't know why but that bit shocked me more somehow!



Oh boy.....


W**F



W**F

A recent trip to the barbers has now brought me fully up-to-speed on the case (Wacko exclusive pages 1,2,tits,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,sport-yawn)


I can't believe most of his left leg was made of plastic and nobody knew! Incredible - considering the moves he pulled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...