Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found a dead cat on the pavement of our street in Sydenham, with its tail off at the base. The cat was laid centre of the pavement at a 45 degree angle. I put it down to foxes or a dog maybe


This was last year in about September or October I think


I live close to Wells Park

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found a dead cat on the pavement of our street

> in Sydenham, with its tail off at the base. The

> cat was laid centre of the pavement at a 45 degree

> angle. I put it down to foxes or a dog maybe

>

> This was last year in about September or October I

> think

>

> I live close to Wells Park


Seabag - please can you tell SNARL about this? Thanks....

I absolutely agree with every word of this.


mrsilencio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but I'm not sure how giving the colour of

> his skin is going to help in any way. It could

> have been a completely innocent incident, so if I

> tell you it was a short white guy then what,

> you're going to hunt down white guys feeding cats

> with malicious intent and ignore everyone else? We

> aren't vigilantes here, and it is extremely

> unproductive sharing what could be misleading

> information.

>

> 101 took a full description and have passed it on

> to the team dealing with it. They are the experts

> here and will use it to help build a profile or

> eliminate it as they see fit. If they deem it

> useful information, they know where they can look

> for CCTV footagr too. I have also spoken to

> someone at SNARL.

>

> I appreciate this is an extremely emotive topic,

> but let's be rational here. Vigilance is more

> helpful than hysteria.

LondonMix wrote


I absolutely agree with every word of this.


mrsilencio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but I'm not sure how giving the colour of

> his skin is going to help in any way. It could

> have been a completely innocent incident, so if I

> tell you it was a short white guy then what,

> you're going to hunt down white guys feeding cats

> with malicious intent and ignore everyone else? We

> aren't vigilantes here, and it is extremely

> unproductive sharing what could be misleading

> information.

>

> 101 took a full description and have passed it on

> to the team dealing with it. They are the experts

> here and will use it to help build a profile or

> eliminate it as they see fit. If they deem it

> useful information, they know where they can look

> for CCTV footagr too. I have also spoken to

> someone at SNARL.

>

> I appreciate this is an extremely emotive topic,

> but let's be rational here. Vigilance is more

> helpful than hysteria.


I thought this had moved on, but as you chipped in, I can only suppose you haven't read the earlier post where mrsilencio gave an otherwise very full description (omitting only IC classification) - that is the weird part - why only leave that one fact out of an otherwise full/decent description which was plainly intended to let us know what that person's appearance was.


Anyway, it's her/his call if he/she wants only to give a partial description - my objection was that the 'argument' advanced to justify it was entirely flawed and illogical. There was actually no need to 'justify' anything with a bogus argument - he/she could simply have said sorry I don't care to do give any more detailed ID description.

No worries - no need for PM. I'm sure we all share the hope the sicko is caught in double quick time. It's likely the publicity will be beneficial - ED must have only a handful (if that) of police officers on patrol at any one time, but if large numbers of the general public are being vigilant when they are out on the streets (or people who know the offender may notice incriminating behaviour), then that must increase the chances of the person responsible being caught.
Surely with the sheer number of incidents the police would be able to find some CCTV footage with the same person popping up again and again. If they actually spent time looking and analysing footage from CCTV cameras near all victims. Especially if criminologists have suggested this sort of crime could potentially progress to "more serious" crimes then surely more should be done by the police to catch them.
They are left in a location which is different to that in which they were taken, so it's not that simple (the police wouldn't have a precise location to check). Also they are not necessarily left where they are to be found at a time close to when they were taken. There's also not that much CCTV in residential streets (not like a main road or high street). I think the best chance of catching him or her must be for someone to be suspicious/see someone they know with gruesome images or remains and to tip off the police, or for a member of the public to see something as its happening or as he/she is planning/hunting for an animal and to dial 999 as requested (not 101).

SNARL says to alert them or the RSPCA,which are now also dealing with this

please stay with the animal until it has been collected....

there have also been reports of foxes & rabbits been victims of these cruel incidents

Cats have been lured with chicken & body parts are usually found at neighbours doors


PLEASE KEEP CATS INSIDE AT NIGHTS

THE LAST ATTEMPT WAS 2 DAYS AGO AT 5.00 IN THE MORNING


has anybody posted this on the lost & found group on here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Shocking - so fast. Machines can have a false device for inserting your card into and then they retain it. Your bank should return your money 
    • FYI East Dulwich neighbours: I was in the middle of a cash withdrawl at the cashpoint at the Tesco Express on ED road (the one next to the Esso petrol station) when a man appeared beside me waving his hands over the screen and saying not to use it because it had just taken his card. He then dissapeared and I cancelled the withdrawl. No card was returned. It took me literally 30 seconds (max) to realise something wasn't right and 'freeze' the card on my mobile/banking app. I immediately got a txt message from my bank saying a transaction had just been declined, and then another. I logged in to app and £251 had already been taken. This all happened increadibly quickly - the whole incident from first encounter to money being taken and me freezing card was probably around 3 minutes. The guy must have somehow seen me put my PIN number in. It's possible there was some kind of card skmming involved, but I don't know for sure. The man was around 5ft 6/7, black and wearing a covid-type face mask. I don't remember what clothes he was wearing. I got the feeling (mainly from his voice and eyes) that he wasn't young - maybe mid-30s to mid-40s (but I can't be sure). Obviously I repoted to police. 
    • It would be incredible if the community supported small businesses rather than a chain (Gail's being a very large chain).   Sadly, consumers don't realise their power - as you can see also by the number of coffee cups etc that are still being bought and contribute to landfill - it' not hard to be responsible, just inconvenient.
    • Surely the main issue for Dulwich Village is their retail offer, like most of Dulwich Village,  is desperately dull and a bit basic.  Not really worth anyone from outside of Dulwich Village travelling for. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...