Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found a dead cat on the pavement of our street in Sydenham, with its tail off at the base. The cat was laid centre of the pavement at a 45 degree angle. I put it down to foxes or a dog maybe


This was last year in about September or October I think


I live close to Wells Park

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found a dead cat on the pavement of our street

> in Sydenham, with its tail off at the base. The

> cat was laid centre of the pavement at a 45 degree

> angle. I put it down to foxes or a dog maybe

>

> This was last year in about September or October I

> think

>

> I live close to Wells Park


Seabag - please can you tell SNARL about this? Thanks....

I absolutely agree with every word of this.


mrsilencio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but I'm not sure how giving the colour of

> his skin is going to help in any way. It could

> have been a completely innocent incident, so if I

> tell you it was a short white guy then what,

> you're going to hunt down white guys feeding cats

> with malicious intent and ignore everyone else? We

> aren't vigilantes here, and it is extremely

> unproductive sharing what could be misleading

> information.

>

> 101 took a full description and have passed it on

> to the team dealing with it. They are the experts

> here and will use it to help build a profile or

> eliminate it as they see fit. If they deem it

> useful information, they know where they can look

> for CCTV footagr too. I have also spoken to

> someone at SNARL.

>

> I appreciate this is an extremely emotive topic,

> but let's be rational here. Vigilance is more

> helpful than hysteria.

LondonMix wrote


I absolutely agree with every word of this.


mrsilencio Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but I'm not sure how giving the colour of

> his skin is going to help in any way. It could

> have been a completely innocent incident, so if I

> tell you it was a short white guy then what,

> you're going to hunt down white guys feeding cats

> with malicious intent and ignore everyone else? We

> aren't vigilantes here, and it is extremely

> unproductive sharing what could be misleading

> information.

>

> 101 took a full description and have passed it on

> to the team dealing with it. They are the experts

> here and will use it to help build a profile or

> eliminate it as they see fit. If they deem it

> useful information, they know where they can look

> for CCTV footagr too. I have also spoken to

> someone at SNARL.

>

> I appreciate this is an extremely emotive topic,

> but let's be rational here. Vigilance is more

> helpful than hysteria.


I thought this had moved on, but as you chipped in, I can only suppose you haven't read the earlier post where mrsilencio gave an otherwise very full description (omitting only IC classification) - that is the weird part - why only leave that one fact out of an otherwise full/decent description which was plainly intended to let us know what that person's appearance was.


Anyway, it's her/his call if he/she wants only to give a partial description - my objection was that the 'argument' advanced to justify it was entirely flawed and illogical. There was actually no need to 'justify' anything with a bogus argument - he/she could simply have said sorry I don't care to do give any more detailed ID description.

No worries - no need for PM. I'm sure we all share the hope the sicko is caught in double quick time. It's likely the publicity will be beneficial - ED must have only a handful (if that) of police officers on patrol at any one time, but if large numbers of the general public are being vigilant when they are out on the streets (or people who know the offender may notice incriminating behaviour), then that must increase the chances of the person responsible being caught.
Surely with the sheer number of incidents the police would be able to find some CCTV footage with the same person popping up again and again. If they actually spent time looking and analysing footage from CCTV cameras near all victims. Especially if criminologists have suggested this sort of crime could potentially progress to "more serious" crimes then surely more should be done by the police to catch them.
They are left in a location which is different to that in which they were taken, so it's not that simple (the police wouldn't have a precise location to check). Also they are not necessarily left where they are to be found at a time close to when they were taken. There's also not that much CCTV in residential streets (not like a main road or high street). I think the best chance of catching him or her must be for someone to be suspicious/see someone they know with gruesome images or remains and to tip off the police, or for a member of the public to see something as its happening or as he/she is planning/hunting for an animal and to dial 999 as requested (not 101).

SNARL says to alert them or the RSPCA,which are now also dealing with this

please stay with the animal until it has been collected....

there have also been reports of foxes & rabbits been victims of these cruel incidents

Cats have been lured with chicken & body parts are usually found at neighbours doors


PLEASE KEEP CATS INSIDE AT NIGHTS

THE LAST ATTEMPT WAS 2 DAYS AGO AT 5.00 IN THE MORNING


has anybody posted this on the lost & found group on here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...