Jump to content

Recommended Posts

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> brum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not far off the mark there Moos. Except I never

> > wear hats.

>

>

> Why Grandma, what big eyes you have!

-------------------------------------------


"Eyes" you say....?



* imagines future "What BIG.....you have " thread *



W**F

This thread keeps reminding me of the Faces song You're So Rude.


My mum she likes you

She thinks you're swell

Got the makings of a dance hall girl


Your low cut frock and your bird's nest hair

Stiletto heels and the way that you swear

She said to take you back to see my folks again on Sunday


Why, it looks as though there's nobody in

They've all gone out to see my Auntie Renee

Don't you worry, you just come right in


I'm sure we'll pass the time til' they come home

Well, let me take your coat, kick off your shoes

Warm your toes, try the sofa


It's getting dark, we'll miss the late night bus, it's only eight?

Well, I'm not takin' any chances

What's that noise, why'd they come back so soon?


Straighten your dress you're really looking a mess

I'll wet my socks, pretend we just got caught in the rain

Oh, you're so rude.

There's a decent article in today's FT about women dressing for work. "Is low-cut too hot for the office" in the Dear Lucy column on page 12. I found it interesting. Unfortunately, I don't know my way around the FT Online or I would post a link. That's not helpful - sorry.

Katie,


I would continue to dress exactly as I pleased. Whatever you're wearing he's going to stare at you so you might as well get comfortable in your own skin and wear whatever you want (and is appropriate for your particular work environment). Don't get weired about it - there's no point.


Px

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so just throwing this out here...what would you do

> (ladies) if you discovered that your new boss was

> a 'starer' even when the top is not low cut? Is

> the solution to wear a really low-cut top as they

> might try better to avoid looking?


Oh my dear Katie7283736. I sincerely hope this is not happening to you (though it looks as though it might be). "Staring" alone would make me feel awkward, but staring at my boobs would make me feel extremely uncomfortable to the extent that I would have to say something. Not an easy situation I would imagine - (men generally don't tend to look at me LOL!). However, as your boss is new, I would definitely call him aside and ask him if he is aware of his conduct. I would also alert him to the fact that his actions are making you feel uncomfortable (I am presuming you are not happy about the gawping). I think that the fact that he is new gives you a slight advantage - so nip it in the bud now.


Good luck. xx

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah so that's why you were washing your hair Katie!

> The solution is obviously a low cut top as you

> suggested combined with a very short skirt. Not

> knowing where to look will make him dizzy, fall

> over and bang his head.




:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...