Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The private boat for Max didn't have MAX written on it, as it's supposed to. And Max's tail wasn't nearly bushy enough. And the wild things... well, they were a bit wrong.


This is what comes of messing with books that people love.


(I've just realised after a few minutes of staring into thin air that I know the entire text of that book by heart - what a waste of memory space!)

  • 3 weeks later...
in the loop, very funny, however my cinema choice of the week has to be "let the right one in", very atmospheric vampire film, in that the main protagonists are kids, an unusual but extremely good film, but only watch if you can stand subtitles. dvd of the week which i watched last night is "the baader-meinhof complex", cracking film which one would think in the arms of a guy ritchie et al would attempt to glamourise the group and their actions, this film doesn,t, it makes them out to be the terrorists they were, all be it, they sure do look good. worth a watch.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BBW do you have a fetish you're not telling us

> about?

>

> Das Boot, Saw (hacksawing feet off), Dead Men's

> Shoes?


Then he should also enjoy the scene from Misery when Kathy Bates hobbles James Caan's feet:


Bates: Do you know what they did to the native workers who stole diamonds? Don't worry, they didn't kill them. No, they had to make sure they could go on working,... ..but they also had to make sure

they could never run away.


The operation was called "hobbling".


Caan: Annie... Whatever you're thinking about doing, please don't do it!


Caan: Annie, for God's...


Bates: Shh, darling. Trust me...


Caan: God's sake!!


Bates: It's for the best.


Caan: Annie, please!


Bates: Almost done. Just one more....


::o

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?
    • It's not very important in the great scheme of things, just a tiny piece of ED history! My OH will remember, having a less ancient brain than mine!
    • I've got one you can borrow. I'll message you the details.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...