Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What with Oliver Boner being the Foxtons of tat shops does this mean some of our traditional, well established and er, useful tat shops will go to the wall?


If that's the case I will happily give time and expertise to defend the rights of tat shop owners to operate without fear of these tat chains muscling in with their slightly cheaper wonky candle stick holders and grossly marked up klobber.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81495
Share on other sites

Thanks ed_pete, great post and a very thoughtful suggestion but I come from a long line of hedonists and I am already halfway through writing Jah Lush's Book of Decadence but haven't had the time to finish it yet due to a serious case of partying of late.


I too would be glad to buy you a drink at the next Forum jolly-up.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81513
Share on other sites

I got that Banksy book a lot cheaper in Fop/Fopp (spelling?) near the Charing Cross Road a week or so back :)



ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh - I don't know. Think I've found a few items

> that you and some of the other regulars might be

> interested in...

>

> Snorky

>

> SeanM

>

> Admin

>

> Dulwich Mum

>

> Jah

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81604
Share on other sites

Oliver Bonas is shit. It's the apogee of Claphamite guff selling utterly useless tat to morons with money to burn. I can only hope that East Dulwich does to OB as Forest Hill did to MacDonalds and they are forced to close. There's a happy medium you know.

If only there was a way that both Oliver Bonas and Foxtons could be razed to the ground at the same time.

It breaks my heart to see firms like them move to Dulwich, they must know there's a market for their evil.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81619
Share on other sites

The shops will only come if the victims are they to keep them in business.


and they are very much there.


wasnt some uninspired hack bleating on about the gentrification of ED in a column in teh times a while ago ? IIRC, she did say she moved from Battersea/Fulham/Clapham or whatever faceless poohole she was in before to escape the all bar one-isation of the area ?


are the two events linked ?


Influx of victims from expensiver flat land to small victorian house land with their young/ not yet birthed family


Influx of overpriced tat shops and Delis catering to the new influx ?



erm, maybe Im being a bit ole skool marxist here, but surely "YOU" & "YOUR LOT" are the reason for the gentification & you shoulbnt blame the shops for trailing along - thats what they do , its hardly odd retail behavior


It doesnt help that such slob lazy journalism seem to consgtantly reiterate what a great place ED is - mainly cos theyse all moving here and dont have an original idea to fill their columns ?



maybe a move to Thamesmead opr Plumstead would have ensured you could have kept the gentrifation of your new manor at bay for a while longer ?



Wait there - Snorkys got it - all you hacks out there - start to slag off ED - describe it as the Bronx of SE London and describe the drive by shootings and pools of blood on the street and the pitiful all night wailing of the blood spattered victims- that would keep the thrusting interlopers + the gentrifiers away wouldnt it ?


Oh, wait there, it would also cause a fall in house prices and we vant have that can we


Hmmmmmmmmmm

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81632
Share on other sites

Snorky, sorry a bit of thread here, but have you got short fat fingers or has somebody jumbled up the keys on your keyboard for a laugh?


OB may well up the anti for some of our more established crap tat shops. They'll just have to be a bit more original than buying everything via Top Drawer every year.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2684-oliver-bonas/#findComment-81682
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...