Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Office leases more so than retail and particularly so for small tenants and even more so outside of central London. Large tenants won't get a break clause for 10 years. A typical supermarket lease is 25 years during which time the landlord cannot remove them though there will typically be rent-reviews every 5 years (upwards only) that both parties are contractually obligated to agree.

LM, yes I'd only been looking at office and small shop leases.


As for the upward only rent increase ours is pegged to the RPI and is twice in the 10 yrs. I have a commercial property lawyer organising all the terms and negotiating the lease and I think he's been pretty good so far.


It's a long term commitment and the wrong lease can cause a lot of problems for a business, so I think it makes sense to pay for a decent lawyer at the outset.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

AA rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh christ, you're probably right. Costa would make

> sense. I really hope not. Wasn't there a (failed)

> campaign to keep Neros opening up in the area.

> Maybe it's time to dust off the placards.


- If there was a protest against Cafe Nero (I didn't live here before Cafe Nero arrived)I'd suggest it wasn't really representative of the majority of ED residents, borne out by the fact that it's generally pretty busy.

- I don't really get why there would be a protest against a coffe shop. If you don't like it, noones going to force you to go there. If no one goes it'll close, if lots of people go,it'll stay open...same as any other outlet.


Ron70

Ron


As you weren't here you won't know what you're talking about.


One of the biggest issues that people protested against was the lack of planning permission. Nero just did the work and then applied retrospectively. Using the financial and legal clout of a multinational they bulldozed through local opinion.


People were also concerned that it took money away from the high street. A local independent run by locals channels its profits back into the local community. In Nero's case it simply goes to anonymous shareholders.


So, no, not the same as any other outlet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
    • Still on the look out for CDs and vinyl.. around all weekend 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...