Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do find it hard to understand 'anger' towards new businesses who will be creating employment and providing a service to people who will enjoy their product. They're also filling an empty unit by the way that was doing nothing for anyone. You're under no obligation to use them, especially while there clearly remains ample retail diversity on LL as evidenced by DF's list of long-standing and hardly Chelsea-like businesses (what does that even mean?)


No area of London is static in either population or economic terms and I think it's really rather sad that some are so unwelcoming and frankly prejudiced towards people who have not lived here as long as you may have. Poke fun at people who like a ?4 loaf if you want, but anger? And I doubt the new Italian place will be duplicating much of anything currently available. As if all Italian restaurants were identical!


By the way, I'm planning a trip to the Ayres bakery this weekend - I look forward to sampling your recommendation which I asked of you in good faith.

I agree by and large but don't see what a "Chelsea lifestyle" has to do with any of these things.


MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Do you need a "Chelsea lifestyle" to use estate

> > agents/pizza/indian/Italian/gift shops then?

>

>

> edcam, the jist seems to be.... curry is good and

> helps you live longer. Having 8 curry houses on

> the lane is great and they last without doing much

> visible business because they are busy all the

> time. Italian food on the other hand is bad and we

> have too many Italian eateries. Cafes / coffee

> shops generally are also bad - why bother when you

> can do it at home?

Apparently Mediterranean diets are good for us! Want an Italian caf?? There's one near where I work - Farringdon / Clerkenwell - old style and today full of Italians! Must be good! I only buy their products from the deli but it was full!

Is Chelsea synonymous with Indian restaurants then? Who knew...


You guys should go and find your own Emmerdale or Ambridge bubble to live in. This is London - it evolves and certainly the advent of good food in this country shouldn't be sniffed at. Nor should new people, so unwelcoming.


No idea what a 'South London budget' is either Louisa - talk about generalisation. Most people gladly spend a few quid more on decent food these days. Don't equate your own failure, poverty or chips & beans nostalgia with others' tastes. Vulgarian.

cle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> No idea what a 'South London budget' is either

> Louisa - talk about generalisation. Most people

> gladly spend a few quid more on decent food these

> days. Don't equate your own failure, poverty or

> chips & beans nostalgia with others' tastes. Vulgarian.


Sorry cle I wasn't aware you were some sort of demographic expert on London. Thanks for letting us all know though, glad you've put me straight on what "decent food is" and that everyone in south London can afford to waste money on pretentious overpriced food that tastes and looks the same as the food the rest of us eat. I have opinions and I'm entitled to them. Whole neighbourhoods hijacked by posh right on lefties who are experts on food clearly equates to boring clones of the same types of overpriced foody destinations.


Louisa.

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was only saying to my son the other day (as we

> looked at the B&S building site) that we're lucky

> to live somewhere where new shops and businesses

> are opening.


The problem is. They are NOT new shops .


The ones that are opening are just replacing ones that have closed down.

People that have lost their livelihoods.


That's the truth of the matter.


Someone's gain is another person's loss..


And that is my main opposition to change.


That is why loyalty is more important than a whim.


You see, I truly like East Dulwich. That's why I choose to live here.


It' those that want continuous change that are not content with living here as it is.


DulwichFox.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > No idea what a 'South London budget' is either

> > Louisa - talk about generalisation. Most people

> > gladly spend a few quid more on decent food

> these

> > days. Don't equate your own failure, poverty or

> > chips & beans nostalgia with others' tastes.

> Vulgarian.

>

> Sorry cle I wasn't aware you were some sort of

> demographic expert on London. Thanks for letting

> us all know though, glad you've put me straight on

> what "decent food is" and that everyone in south

> London can afford to waste money on pretentious

> overpriced food that tastes and looks the same as

> the food the rest of us eat. I have opinions and

> I'm entitled to them. Whole neighbourhoods

> hijacked by posh right on lefties who are experts

> on food clearly equates to boring clones of the

> same types of overpriced foody destinations.

>

> Louisa.


Yes, indeed when it comes to sweeping generalisations on this board about class, human behaviour and people's wealth and means - possibly there is room for another to share your limelight?


"The rest of us" - haha

Burroandsalvia,


I would like to apologise on behalf of ED that your simple introductory post has been hijacked and diverted by the usual suspects saying the same boring things over again and again and AGAIN. I suspect the majority of people in ED are friendly and open minded, and I like look forward to your opening. Welcome.


Louisa/Dulwichfox/anyone else involved


PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE go and open a new debate in the lounge dedicated to gentrification so that you can leave other threads alone to stay on subject. Thanks.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Italian food is full of carbs and unfortunately

> has be hijacked by the pretentious guardianista

> brigade in London. Such a shame because I used to

> love the old fashioned style Italian restaurants,

> which have all gone now.

>

> Louisa.


I think your (obviously intended) parody might be helped by using phrases like "When I were a lass" and "back in the good old days" and then maybe you can link it to some image of foxy strolling down LL like Dick van Dyke with all the merry shopkeeps hailing him from their doorways and bidding him good morrow as smiling foxes gambol in his wake.


No?

I think the new place sounds great. And think everyone who is being negative about a new venture opening should vent their opinions elsewhere - it's rather rude to the new business. This happened with the dog shop too! We are lucky to live in such a vibrant area. Good luck burro e salvia! :)

I got the impression a lot of the reason shops were changing hands in East Dulwich was due to landlords putting rent up to unaffordable levels for the current tenants rather than locals wanting posher shops.


I am just pleased that Lordship Lane isn't ending up full of empty shops and that people are still willing to try to make a go of new businesses here. Oh, and that it isn't becoming a clone high street with nothing but chains.


Good luck to all the new businesses starting in the area.

So all people who eat in decent italian restaurants are guardian reading lefties ?? with too much money to spend ? ... Who knew Louisa knew more about me than I do! Thanks for letting me know, I wouldn't have figured it out otherwise thanks to that piece of sweeping & as usual, predictable generalisation. phew !


btw...I worked in a bakery on the kings rd a couple of years ago, believe me the lane has a long way to go to get chelseafied ....and isn't filled with lefties I assure you

Why don't they close all those shops and restaurants selling foreign muck and reopen them as greasy spoon caffs, then close the gastropubs and reopen them as old fashioned boozers where you could share a nice pint with Mad Frankie Fraser and his mates? And then invite Dick Van Dyke back to relive his triumphant chimney sweep days?


That would show Grauniad reading "lefties" like me.

And all the Foxy / Louisa bashers continue when we aren't even posting.


Accusing us of posting off topic.


Why not say something positive yourself on topic instead of talking about me and Louisa.

It is not either of us that are posting off topic.


and what has Dick Van Dyke got to do with anything..??


DF

Equally excited about the new addition and thrilled that another empty shop will once again be full. I agree - posts seem to be losing their thread and being hijacked by negativity.... quite tiring and often somewhat depressing.

Otta yes I've been to Thats Amore on Kirkdale it's a really nice place with friendly service. To everyone banging on about my 'negativity', as Fox suggests, talk about what you love rather than what you so dislike about another individual's personal opinions on things. We don't live in a dictatorship, and an open forum such as this is for everyone who lives in and loves East Dulwich- old and new. Clearly some of the guardianista believe this forum and all the shops who open in ED should only reflect their way of life and anyone who disagrees should be shunned and made to look like a troll because we have a love for different things.


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


"Take a stroll with me down Lordship lane any time of day and just see how many people know me and even wave. I'm well known to many local businesses and on friendly terms."


I almost threw up reading that.


Folie de grandeur.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...