Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I like the interior, it's very soft and unthreatening. You don't get the feeling anyone would even think of causing any trouble in there. Food wasn't bad when I ate there and good value I thought, the cheeses looked particularly yummy. Was a bit cold in there last night, maybe an open fireplace would make it feel a bit warmer.

Nero,

I believe Lozzy was simply referencing our recent (James/*Bob*) spat..


Let's all be friends.. if James is allowed his little bit of 'social racism' with continual sneery use of the word 'Chav' (for no reason other than people not speakin proper and possibly not buying the Guardian) then a light misuse of the word 'Gay' might help him remember not everyone thinks it's 'on'.


Not wishing to open up old wounds.. but seems fair to clear Lozzy's name. On with the thread.

>>if James is allowed his little bit of 'social racism' with continual sneery use of the word 'Chav' (for no reason other than people not speakin proper and possibly not buying the Guardian) then a light misuse of the word 'Gay' might help him remember not everyone thinks it's 'on'.


Love the way that you're able to read my mind Bob. What a gift you have! Apart from your blatant hypocrisy (so two wrongs make a right?) you still fail to understand the basic point.


Why is it so difficult for you to grasp that using the name for someone's sexuality as an insult is a bit nasty? And that the word "chav" does not mean "a working-class person" (perhaps it does to you, in which case you're more nasty and bigoted than i thought. Your definition above is YOUR view - not mine).


"Chav" is an insult - meaning a particular kind of lout who engages in anti-social behaviour. If you are suggesting that all working-class people are chavs you are insulting the majority of working-class people (including one of my close friends) who most certainly are not.


"Gay" is not an insult. Unless you are a sad, narrow-minded, prejudiced person.

"Threshers is pikey chavtastic"


""Chav" is an insult - meaning a particular kind of lout who engages in anti-social behaviour. If you are suggesting that all working-class people are chavs you are insulting the majority of working-class people (including one of my close friends) who most certainly are not."


Sorry David - but have to point out that these two comments came from the same person. Sorry Mr Administrator.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...