Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The one (still empty long after completion) at the

> junction of Overhill & Underhill Roads.


Yes - top prize to this one. It has absolutely no merit whatsoever, either to look at or (see above) to live in.

That sprawling collection of nonsense called GV15 by ED railway station. Unimaginative and depressing.


DKH is pretty good; the wood and dark grey look modern and well-coordinated. Ditto the block opposite - Mary Seacow Court or something - especially when the sun hits the bright brick-red staircase in the evening.


NB: 3-bed flat in Overhill/Underhill block: ?390k.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

>

> > They could fill it with water and fish - it

> might

> > make a nice aquarium.

>

> Swapping the fish for Foxtons employees would be a

> better idea.


yes, the swap would be good, but keep some hungry sharks in there too, for the sport!

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nancysmum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > yes, the swap would be good, but keep some

> hungry

> > sharks in there too, for the sport!

>

> Might not need any


I love the way this forum can turn almost any conversation into estate agent genocide. Keep it up folks it?s far more entertaining than racism and homophobia which seem to be the flavour of the week at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...