Jump to content

The Best Bar in East Dulwich 2007 award - discussion


Recommended Posts

Popped into the Bishop this afternoon - hmmmmm... what is all the fuss about? worn out seating, grubby and tatty decor, artwork that looked like it was from East Street market, that odd arangement of mirrors and the ugly looking East Germanic air con unit hoiked to the ceiling. And, the conversation between punters and girl behind bar was basically not-very-nice sexual banter. Place seemed pretty seedy for a Wednesday afternoon. Reminded me of, now what was that other place called..... The Forresters!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrBen, just to clarify, Punch Taverns own the CPT,

> but they sell the lease to people who then

> effectively do what they want with it. It's

> current owner made the decision to paint it, and

> paid for the patio out front and the

> reupholstering for the seats and all that.

> Unfortunately, she's just left the place to rot,

> and wants rid, so someone else will buy it from

> her (there have been a couple of people looking at

> it) and then do as they see fit. Punch Taverns

> really have nothing to do with the pub other than

> to supply the beer. For the record, I know one

> interested party was exploring the possibility of

> extending out back to build a kitchen.



The CPT - If that back room isn't the "restaurant" and the front bit "the bar", with a genneric "gastro-menu" by this time next year, I'll eat my hat... and my trousers...

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there a system in place so that each forumite can only post once?


There should be yes, why can you vote twice? It does seem though that if you go to the best bar vote via the Lounge then you can revoke your vote then vote for someone else. Now removed


Did everyone get an email last night about the voting?


[edited once]

People prefer bland. Put it this way: when we go into a video store while we have the option of an edgy, interesting indie/foreign movie, most people most of the time will watch the safe, predictable Hollowood (sic) product. Partly because stepping out of the normal routine is a risk and also becuase those films (like the Bishop pub, etc.) are ones that all your mates/family watch or that are already the most well-known.


Plus, I might be wrong, but the Bish has got the latest licence on LL. This could be a factor ...

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is the perfect boozer.



As Rolo said, good luck to them, I don't hate anyone there or anything, but "perfect boozer"... Come on, it is not a boozer!


Besides, late lisenses are crap, it just means the busy place you're in gets busier as everyone tries for that last pint... What you need is a lock in :)-D

They used to have a policy of having to be in by a certain time to partake of the late licence.

I don't know whether getting rid of that is a good or bad thing. Depends on whether i'm on the inside or the outside I guess (though they usually snuck me in anyway B), it pays to get on well with the door staff)

My big problem with the EDT is the absolutely crap seats that always seem on the brink of collapsing under you. However, I do quite like it in there as a whole.


Mag has the same seating issues, why of why do so many pubs think that buying old church seats is a good idea? They are by definition uncomfortable, and the churches are getting rid for a reason!

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> It is the perfect boozer.

>


Hmmm, not with you there, Charlie. It's alright, and I've never had a shit night in there, but neither have I had one that sticks in the memory. So many other places I have met all kinds of characters. Never, alas, in the Bish. S'alright for one or two, IMO, but lacks the coherence, ambience and nuances of other ED watering holes.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrBen, just to clarify, Punch Taverns own the CPT,

> but they sell the lease to people who then

> effectively do what they want with it. It's

> current owner made the decision to paint it, and

> paid for the patio out front and the

> reupholstering for the seats and all that.

> Unfortunately, she's just left the place to rot,

> and wants rid, so someone else will buy it from

> her (there have been a couple of people looking at

> it) and then do as they see fit. Punch Taverns

> really have nothing to do with the pub other than

> to supply the beer. For the record, I know one

> interested party was exploring the possibility of

> extending out back to build a kitchen.



Keef it sounds like Punch own the freehold no? And my point was a commercial one. If they can get more money for their lease next time round (from a new proprietor with ideas) I guess they will. But more importantly, Keef, in your opinion CPT - front or back bit (football nothwithstanding)??

Well I used to spend more time in the back "lounge bar" or "Old Side" we tend to call it, but in recent times I am definitely in the front "New Side" more often. However, this time of year, I suspect we'll find ourselves back to the long table by the fire in the Old Side. More cosy!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...